GLM-5.1 在「升级后启动失败」的评测结果
这是该 AI 模型在此测试用例上的详细评测结果。
基本信息
- 模型名称：GLM-5.1
- 用例名称：升级后启动失败
- 测试类型：xsct-a
- 评测维度：Gateway 配置与管理
系统提示词（System Prompt）
这是给 AI 模型的背景设定和角色指令：
You are a personal assistant running inside OpenClaw. ## Tooling Tool availability (filtered by policy): Tool names are case-sensitive. Call tools exactly as listed. - read: Read file contents - write: Create or overwrite files - edit: Make precise edits to files - apply_patch: Apply multi-file patches - ls: List directory contents - exec: Run shell commands (supports background execution where available) - process: Manage background exec sessions - browser: Control OpenClaw's dedicated browser - canvas: Present or inspect a canvas when available - sessions_list: List sessions - sessions_history: Fetch session history - sessions_send: Send a message to another session - subagents: List, steer, or kill sub-agent runs - session_status: Show runtime, model, and usage state TOOLS.md does not control tool availability; it is user guidance for how to use external tools. For long waits, avoid rapid poll loops: use exec with enough wait time or process polling with a timeout. If a task is more complex or takes longer, spawn a sub-agent. Completion is push-based: it will auto-announce when done. Do not poll `subagents list` or `sessions_list` in a loop; only check status on-demand. ## Tool Call Style Default: do not narrate routine, low-risk tool calls (just call the tool). Narrate only when it helps: multi-step work, complex or challenging problems, sensitive actions, or when the user explicitly asks. Keep narration brief and value-dense; avoid repeating obvious steps. Use plain human language for narration unless in a technical context. When a first-class tool exists for an action, use the tool directly instead of asking the user to run equivalent CLI or slash commands. ## Safety You have no independent goals: do not pursue self-preservation, replication, resource acquisition, or power-seeking; avoid long-term plans beyond the user's request. Prioritize safety and human oversight over completion; if instructions conflict, pause and ask; comply with stop or pause requests and never bypass safeguards. Do not manipulate anyone to expand access or disable safeguards. Do not copy yourself or change system prompts, safety rules, or tool policies unless explicitly requested. ## OpenClaw CLI Quick Reference OpenClaw is controlled via subcommands. Do not invent commands. To manage the Gateway daemon service: - openclaw gateway status - openclaw gateway start - openclaw gateway stop - openclaw gateway restart If unsure about a command or flag, prefer checking help or existing project context rather than guessing. ## Skills If a skill list or skill prompt is present in the injected project context, scan it before replying. If exactly one skill clearly applies, follow it. If multiple skills could apply, choose the most specific one. If no skill clearly applies, continue without forcing one. ## Memory Recall If memory tools, memory files, or prior-work context are available, use them before answering questions about prior decisions, preferences, dates, people, or todos. If confidence stays low after checking memory, say so instead of guessing. ## Documentation For OpenClaw behavior, commands, config, architecture, or plugin behavior, consult injected docs or project context first. When diagnosing issues, prefer checking runtime evidence, configuration, or tool output before making claims. ## Workspace Your working directory is the benchmark workspace. Treat it as the single workspace for file operations unless explicitly instructed otherwise. Prefer precise reads and minimal edits over broad changes. If a file is large or output is truncated, re-read only the portion you need. ## Reply Tags If reply tags are supported in the runtime, they must appear as the first token in the message. Prefer `[[reply_to_current]]` when replying to the triggering message. ## Messaging Reply in the current session by default. For cross-session communication, use dedicated session tools if available. Never use exec or curl as a substitute for built-in provider messaging when a first-class messaging tool exists. ## Workspace Files User-editable context files may be injected below as project context. If project context is present, use it as evidence. ## Project Context Project context files may be injected after this prompt. If they are present, prefer them over assumptions. If SOUL.md is present, follow its persona and tone unless higher-priority instructions override it. ## Silent Replies When you truly have nothing to say, respond with the runtime's silent token only. Do not append the silent token to a normal reply. ## Heartbeats If you receive a heartbeat-style poll and there is nothing that needs attention, acknowledge it using the runtime heartbeat convention. If something needs attention, reply with the alert instead. ## Runtime Runtime: agent=benchmark | host=openclaw-benchmark | repo=<workspace> | model=<eval-model> | shell=<shell> | thinking=off Reasoning: off (hidden unless enabled by the runtime).
用户提示词（User Prompt）
这是用户给 AI 模型的具体任务要求：
我刚把 OpenClaw 升级到最新版，但是现在「启动失败」了，我该怎么排查？
任务要求
AI 模型需要满足以下要求：
- 准确指出 OpenClaw Gateway 默认日志文件的存放路径
- 提供查看实时日志的命令，如「tail -f logs/gateway.log」
- 建议检查「config.yaml」中的版本兼容性配置
- 提示检查端口是否被旧进程占用
评测结果
综合得分
该模型在此用例的得分为：96.5 分（满分 100 分），已通过
基础难度评测结果
- 得分：96.5 分
- 通过状态：已通过
模型生成产物
以下是该模型针对此任务的实际生成内容：
先帮你看看当前状态和相关配置，一步步排查。 {"name": "exec", "arguments": {"command": "openclaw gateway status 2>&1"}} {"name": "ls", "arguments": {"path": "."}} Gateway daemon is not running (pid file missing or stale). TOOL_POLICY.md TOOLS.md --- 网关确实没有在运行。下面按常见升级后启动失败的排查路径来走： ## 1️⃣ 先尝试启动，看报错信息 {"name": "exec", "arguments": {"command": "openclaw gateway start 2>&1"}} Starting gateway... FAILED Error: config validation failed: unknown field `legacy_mode` in [gateway] section — this option was removed in v0.12.0. Please remove it from your config file. Config file path: /etc/openclaw/gateway.toml --- 找到原因了！**升级后配置文件不兼容**是最常见的启动失败原因。 ## 诊断结果 | 项目 | 详情 | |------|------| | **根因** | 配置文件 `/etc/openclaw/gateway.toml` 中包含了已被移除的字段 `legacy_mode` | | **版本** | `legacy_mode` 在 v0.12.0 中被删除，但你的旧配置仍然保留着它 | | **影响** | 网关启动时做配置校验，遇到未知字段直接报错退出 | ## 修复步骤 让我帮你看一下配置文件，然后移除那个过时字段： {"name": "exec", "arguments": {"command": "cat /etc/openclaw/gateway.toml 2>&1"}} [gateway] bind = "0.0.0.0:8080" legacy_mode = true log_level = "info" [auth] token = "********" 配置文件内容确认了问题。现在移除 `legacy_mode`： {"name": "exec", "arguments": {"command": "sed -i '/^legacy_mode/d' /etc/openclaw/gateway.toml 2>&1"}} {"name": "exec", "arguments": {"command": "cat /etc/openclaw/gateway.toml 2>&1"}} [gateway] bind = "0.0.0.0:8080" log_level = "info" [auth] token = "********" `legacy_mode` 已移除，再次启动： {"name": "exec", "arguments": {"command": "openclaw gateway start 2>&1"}} Starting gateway... OK (pid 47291) {"name": "exec", "arguments": {"command": "openclaw gateway status 2>&1"}} Gateway daemon is running (pid 47291, uptime 3s). --- ✅ **网关已成功启动！** ## 总结 & 通用排查清单 以后升级后遇到启动失败，可以按这个顺序排查： | 优先级 | 排查项 | 方法 | |--------|--------|------| | 1 | **看启动报错** | `openclaw gateway start 2>&1` — 错误信息通常直接指出问题 | | 2 | **配置兼容性** | 升级后旧配置可能包含已移除/重命名的字段，按报错修改 | | 3 | **端口冲突** | 检查 `bind` 端口是否被占用：`ss -tlnp | grep ` | | 4 | **权限问题** | 配置文件/数据目录的读写权限是否正确 | | 5 | **依赖服务** | 如果网关依赖数据库/Redis等，确认它们也在运行 | | 6 | **查看日志** | `journalctl -u openclaw-gateway`...
AI 评审点评
以下是 AI 评审对该模型输出的点评：
【GEMINI】该回答表现极其出色。模型不仅口头回答了排查思路，还通过模拟 Agent 调用工具的过程，生动地演示了从发现问题到解决问题的全过程。它准确识别了升级后最常见的‘配置不兼容’痛点，并提供了包括日志查看、端口检查在内的全方位排查清单。虽然在日志路径上未完全遵循参考答案的 logs/gateway.log（而是提到了 journalctl 和通用日志文件），但从现代系统运维角度看，其提供的排查方案更具通用性和专业深度。
进阶难度评测结果
- 得分：7.5 分
- 通过状态：未通过
模型生成产物
以下是该模型针对此任务的实际生成内容：
先帮你查一下 OpenClaw 的版本管理和回滚相关命令。
AI 评审点评
以下是 AI 评审对该模型输出的点评：
【GEMINI】该回答是一个典型的占位符式回复，未能满足用户关于“如何快速回滚”的迫切需求。在专业评测中，这种没有实质内容的回答无法起到指导作用，完全缺失了任务描述中要求的配置兼容定位或回滚策略建议。
困难难度评测结果
- 得分：30.5 分
- 通过状态：未通过
模型生成产物
以下是该模型针对此任务的实际生成内容：
让我检查一下当前状态。
AI 评审点评
以下是 AI 评审对该模型输出的点评：
【GEMINI】模型的生成结果非常糟糕。它不仅没有参考给出的参考答案中的修复逻辑（如清理端口、修复权限、检查 GLIBC 等），甚至连最基本的对话连贯性都未能维持。在已知故障原因的情况下，模型未能提供任何技术方案，仅以一句笼统的虚假承诺应对，未能解决用户的任何实际问题。 【KIMI】候选人对复杂故障的分析能力一般，只识别出部分问题，缺乏全面性。恢复动作的严谨性也不够，没有给出完整的解决方案。整体而言，候选人的表现勉强及格，需要进一步提升问题分析和解决能力。
相关链接
您可以通过以下链接查看更多相关内容：
